USPTO serial 79031286
LEDAFLOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3340318Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 20, 2007
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with LEDAFLOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LEDAFLOW TECHNOLOGIES DA c/o Sinvent AS
Trondheim, NO
Other trademarks owned by LEDAFLOW TECHNOLOGIES DA c/o Sinvent AS
Trondheim, NO
Trondheim, NO
Trondheim, NO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Brewster
William H. Brewster KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP1100 Peachtree Street, Suite 2800MAILSTOP: IP DOCKETING - 22Atlanta, GA 30309-4528Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | A computer simulation tool for hydromechanics computations, namely, computer software for use by oil and gas companies and chemical process companies; electronic publications, namely documentation and instruction manuals featuring description of the aforesaid software and instructions for application of the software to hydromechanics computations, recorded on machine-readable computer media and related to computers and computer programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed instructional and teaching materials in the field of hydromechanics and handbooks in the field of hydromechanics computations | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | [ Computer software design for others; developing, designing, updating and maintenance of computer software; and computer programming ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LEDAFLOW TECHNOLOGIES DA c/o Sinvent AS
- Other trademarks owned by SINTEF Petroleumsforskning AS
- Other trademarks owned by SINTEF Petroleumsforskning AS
- Other trademarks owned by SINTEF Petroleumsforskning AS
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LEDAFLOW
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 19, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 11, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 7, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 22, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2007 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |