Drawing for SH SYSTEM HOLZ

USPTO serial 79031327

SH SYSTEM HOLZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3531116Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 11, 2008
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SH SYSTEM HOLZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUE10TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal doors, metal frames for building, metal frames for wardrobe doors, metal frames for kitchen wall cupboard, framework of metal for building, door frames of metal, window frames of metal; metal profiles, metal hinges, door handles of metal and angle irons for furniture; metal props, namely, metal wall bearings for metal shelves; ironmongery, namely, metal screws, metal door joints, metal gaskets for furniture frames and for hanging wall units, and metal coverings for hingesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 31, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 10, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 10, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 8, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 12, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 12, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 5, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 24, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 11, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 11, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 26, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 6, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 23, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 22, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 17, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 16, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 15, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 2, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 2, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 22, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 8, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 9, 2008DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Feb 7, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 29, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 18, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 4, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 4, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 21, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance