Drawing for UNI-LUBE

USPTO serial 79031352

UNI-LUBE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3389137Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 26, 2008
Examiner
BRODY, DANIEL S
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with UNI-LUBE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen Lim

Karen Lim FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.151 WEST 42nd St., 17 Fl.NEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040Coating of metal articles with polymers by wet coating processesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 8, 2020CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Dec 10, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 3, 2018NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2018C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 3, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 12, 2018ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 23, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Feb 26, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 15, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 15, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 4, 201471AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Feb 4, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 13, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2008LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Nov 20, 2008LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 2, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 2, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 27, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 11, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 7, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 6, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 4, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 4, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 9, 2007CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Aug 2, 2007CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 29, 2007RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 8, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 8, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 7, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance