Drawing for WACS

USPTO serial 79031381

WACS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3356618Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 18, 2007
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WACS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew Roppel

ANDREW ROPPEL HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 8749DENVER, CO 80201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Regulators being parts of [ machines ] * incinerators *SECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
009electric and electronic control and regulation apparatus and instruments, namely industrial automation controls and electronic control systems for [ machines ] * incinerators * [ ; recorded computer software, namely, software and software platforms for monitoring and controlling the operations, equipment, and machinery of factories and industrial plants ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 9, 2008FINAFINAL DISPOSITION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2008DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 3, 2008COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Mar 3, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Feb 15, 2008LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 18, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 30, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 24, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 13, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 11, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 15, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 26, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 24, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance