Drawing for D-XENOGON

USPTO serial 79031418

D-XENOGON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3550328Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 23, 2008
Examiner
DUBOIS, MICHELLE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with D-XENOGON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JONATHAN MYERS

JONATHAN MYERS THE FIRM OF KARL F. ROSS P.C.5676 RIVERDALE AVENUE BOX 900BRONX, NY 10471-0900UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SCIENTIFIC, NAUTICAL, SURVEYING, ELECTRIC, ELECTRONIC, OPTO-ELECTRONIC, PHOTOGRAPHIC, CINEMATOGRAPHIC, OPTICAL, WEIGHING, MEASURING, SIGNALING, CHECKING AND SUPERVISION APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, OPTICAL DETECTORS IN THE NATURE OF OPTICAL CHARACTER READERS AND OPTICAL SCANNERS, OPTICAL LENSES FOR SCANNING OR READING CHARACTERS IN A TELEFAXING OR COPYING APPARATUS; PHOTOGRAPHIC, CINEMATOGRAPHIC AND PROJECTION OBJECTIVES, NAMELY, COMBINATIONS OF PHOTOGRAPHIC LENSES FOR USE WITH CAMERAS, ENLARGERS AND PROJECTORS; LIGHT METERS, OPTICAL REFLECTORS, CONDENSERS, DIAPHRAGMS FOR CAMERAS, OPTICAL POWER SPLITTERS, DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSORS; PROJECTOR LAMPS AND FLASH LAMPS FOR CAMERAS; APPARATUS FOR RECORDING, TRANSMISSION OR REPRODUCTION OF SOUND AND IMAGES, NAMELY, FILM CAMERAS, VIDEO CAMERAS, PHOTOGRAPHIC PROJECTORS, OPTICAL/ELECTRICAL TRANSDUCERS, ELECTRICAL/OPTICAL TRANSDUCERS, FLAT PANEL DISPLAY SCREENS, ELECTRIC LUMINESCENT DISPLAY PANELS; BLANK MAGNETIC DATA CARRIERS; DATA-PROCESSING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, COMPUTERS, COMPUTER INTERFACE BOARDS, OPTICAL COMPUTER INPUTS, NAMELY, INTERFACES; PRINTED CIRCUIT CARDS FOR INTERFACING COMPUTERS AND OPTICAL CHARACTER RECOGNITION DEVICES, NAMELY, INTERFACES; LENSES FOR USE WITH PHOTOGRAPHIC AND CINEMATOGRAPHIC CAMERAS; LENSES FOR USE IN AND FOR USE WITH PHOTOGRAPHIC AND CINEMATOGRAPHIC PROJECTORS; OPTICAL GLASSES, OPTICAL FIBERS SOLD AS A COMPONENT OF FIBER OPTICAL CABLES, FILTERS, NAMELY, OPTICAL FILTERS, CAMERA FILTERSSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042DESIGN OF OBJECTIVES AND OPTICAL RECORDING, TRANSMISSION AND REPRODUCTION SYSTEMS FOR OTHERSSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 2018UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Sep 20, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 20, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 12, 2016INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 3, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 3, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 24, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 24, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 1, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 1, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 23, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 7, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 17, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 30, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 26, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 31, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2008NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Jun 30, 2008NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 18, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 29, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 8, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 7, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 6, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 5, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 15, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 25, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 22, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 19, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance