USPTO serial 79031431
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark B. Harrison
MARK B. HARRISON VENABLEP.O. BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beer [ ; mineral and aerated waters; fruit drinks and fruit juices; Non-alcoholic drinks, namely, non-alcoholic beer, carbonated beverages, non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices, non-alcoholic malt beverage, and punch; syrups, namely, syrups for making beverages and other preparations for making beverages, namely, syrups for making soft drinks, malt syrup for beverages, syrups for making whey-based beverages, syrup for making lemonade ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | [ Alcoholic beverages, except beers, namely, wines, sparkling wines, distilled spirits and potable spirits, liqueurs ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | [ Providing of food and drink; providing temporary accommodation ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2019 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 15, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 4, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2008 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |