Drawing for TPACK

USPTO serial 79031443

TPACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3602586Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 7, 2009
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TPACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Design, development, installation and integration of embedded software and integrated circuits for data communication, namely, switches for software, copying of embedded software and integrated circuits, computer programming and programming of integrated circuits, installation of embedded software, computer software and integrated circuits, design of systems for data communication, physical conversion of data or documents to electronic media; non-physical conversion of computer programs, integrated circuits and data; licensing of industrial property rights, computer software and chipsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Dec 16, 2016UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Nov 25, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Nov 25, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 15, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jul 15, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jul 13, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Nov 13, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jan 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 7, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 18, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 22, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 22, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jul 7, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 7, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 27, 2009CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED
Jan 22, 2009CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 20, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 31, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 9, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 9, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 9, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Oct 30, 2008RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Oct 30, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Aug 18, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Aug 18, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Aug 15, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
May 22, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 8, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 8, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 6, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 6, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 16, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 16, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 15, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 10, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 18, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 4, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 4, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Dec 21, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 8, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 7, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance