USPTO serial 79031447
TEXLON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3554250Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 30, 2008
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with TEXLON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. Gwen Peterson
R. Gwen Peterson Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP1100 Peachtree Street, Suite 2800Mailstop: IP Docketing - 22Atlanta, GA 30309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Building materials, namely, non-metal roof sheets and wall sheets made from one or more of multi-ply inflatable, transparent, translucent plastic foils to be applied to walls and roofs of building halls, pavilions, greenhouses and protective buildings for the foodstuff industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lightspan Holding GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Vector Foiltec GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Vector Foiltec GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Vector Foiltec GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Foiltec Verarbeitung; von Folien und Textilien GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Lightspan Holding GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named TEXLON
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2026 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 17, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 17, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 8, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |