USPTO serial 79031465
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Officine Meccaniche Molina & Bianchi S.p.A.
I-27029 Vigevano PV, IT
Other trademarks owned by Officine Meccaniche Molina & Bianchi S.p.A.
Officine Meccaniche Molina & Bianchi S.p.A.
IT
Other trademarks owned by Officine Meccaniche Molina & Bianchi S.p.A.
Officine Meccaniche Molina & Bianchi S.p.A.
IT
Other trademarks owned by Officine Meccaniche Molina & Bianchi S.p.A.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINES FOR USE IN THE SHOE INDUSTRY, NAMELY, MACHINE LASTS FOR MAKING SHOES, MACHINE LASTS FOR MAKING SHOES IN THE NATURE OF PULLING OVER-LASTING MACHINE AND HEEL SEAT AND SIDES LASTING MACHINE, COMPUTERIZED AUTOMATIC SHOE BOTTOM ROUGHING MACHINE FOR MAKING SHOES, AUTOMATIC SHOE BOTTOM CEMENTING MACHINE FOR MAKING SHOES, COMPUTERIZED CEMENTING AND POUNDING MACHINE FOR SHOEMAKING, COMPUTERIZED SHOE SOLE CEMENTING MACHINE FOR MAKING SHOES, BRUSH AND SPRAY DAMPING MACHINES FOR USE IN THE SHOEMAKING INDUSTRY, HEAT TRANSFER PRESSES FOR PRE-HEATING SHOE CROWNS IN SHOEMAKING, LEATHER CUTTING MACHINES FOR SHOEMAKING, LEATHER GRINDING MACHINES FOR SHOEMAKING, LEATHER TANNING MACHINES FOR SHOEMAKING, LEATHER FINISHING MACHINES FOR SHOEMAKING; MACHINE PARTS FOR SHOE TREES, NAMELY, BEARINGS AND BUSHINGS, FLEXIBLE SHAFT COUPLINGS | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | [ Shoes ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | IRIV | IRREGULARITY ON INVALIDATION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 10, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2013 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 10, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 15, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 24, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |