USPTO serial 79031485
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
89259 Weißenhorn, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Friedrich Kueffner
317 MADISON AVE STE 910NEW YORK, NY 10017-5246UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL FORMWORK FOR CONCRETE AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREOF AND REINFORCEMENTS OF METAL THEREFOR; STRUCTURAL SCAFFOLDINGS, FACADE SCAFFOLDINGS, AND SCAFFOLDS, AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR, ALL OF METAL; SUPPORTS OF METAL FOR FORMWORK AND SCAFFOLDS AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | NON-METAL FORMWORK FOR CONCRETE STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREOF AND REINFORCEMENTS NOT OF METAL THEREFOR; STRUCTURAL SCAFFOLDINGS, FACADE SCAFFOLDINGS, AND SCAFFOLDS, AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR, ALL OF NON-METAL; SUPPORTS OF WOOD FOR FORMWORK AND SCAFFOLDS AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREOF | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 4, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 10, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 8, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 8, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |