Drawing for GRIDFLEX

USPTO serial 79031485

GRIDFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERKINS, ELLEN J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRIDFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Friedrich Kueffner

317 MADISON AVE STE 910NEW YORK, NY 10017-5246UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006METAL FORMWORK FOR CONCRETE AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREOF AND REINFORCEMENTS OF METAL THEREFOR; STRUCTURAL SCAFFOLDINGS, FACADE SCAFFOLDINGS, AND SCAFFOLDS, AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR, ALL OF METAL; SUPPORTS OF METAL FOR FORMWORK AND SCAFFOLDS AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFORSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
019NON-METAL FORMWORK FOR CONCRETE STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREOF AND REINFORCEMENTS NOT OF METAL THEREFOR; STRUCTURAL SCAFFOLDINGS, FACADE SCAFFOLDINGS, AND SCAFFOLDS, AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR, ALL OF NON-METAL; SUPPORTS OF WOOD FOR FORMWORK AND SCAFFOLDS AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREOFSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 28, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 4, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 18, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 18, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 18, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 10, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 8, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 22, 2010EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 30, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 30, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 1, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 6, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 2, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 31, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 30, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 10, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 22, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 8, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 13, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 13, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 31, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 2, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 30, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 30, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 30, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2007RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Jan 25, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 24, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance