Drawing for AUMUND

USPTO serial 79031491

AUMUND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3485078Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 12, 2008
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with AUMUND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer S. Stachniak

Jennifer S. Stachniak Johnson, Marcou & Isaacs, LLC27 City Square, Suite 1Hoschton, GA 30548UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Industrial machines, namely, apron feeders, heavy-duty apron feeders, deep drawn pan conveyors, bucket apron conveyors, pivoting pan conveyors, drag chain conveyors, mobile link conveyors, flat plate conveyors with plate, short plate conveyors, belt bucket elevators, central chain bucket elevators, double bucket elevators, bucket elevators with gravity discharge, pendulum bucket elevators for transporting, storing, distributing, withdrawing, mixing, dosing, homogenizing, bunkering and apportioning of bulk materials; machines and mechanical apparatus, namely, rotary discharged machines, also rotating, gravity discharge gates, grab unloading hoppers, armored chain conveyors, cleaning conveyors, telescopic loading spouts, stockyards and blending bed systems, bridge-type scraper reclaimers, portal- and semi portal scraper reclaimers, multiple purpose portal bridge reclaimers, cantilever scraper reclaimers, combined stacker/scraper reclaimers, circular storages with stacker and cantilever reclaimers or bridge-type scraper reclaimers for emptying bunkers, silos and large storage rooms as well as for loosening bulk material stored therein; chain conveyors and conveyors for hot material; belt conveyor systems, particularly consisting of steel plate conveyors and conveyors of different construction, belt conveyors; vertical and pendulum bucket conveyors incorporating supporting constructions in the form of belt bridges and delivery towers; systems for tipping wagons in the form of front tippers, rotary tippers and side tippersACTIVE—
012Cars for emptying bunkersACTIVE—
042Product development, namely, technical planning, development, projecting and designing of apparatus, machines and facilities for transporting, storing, distributing, withdrawing, wiping off, dosing, homogenizing, bunkering and apportioning of bulk material; engineering services, namely, technical analysis services and technical survey in the field of apparatus, machines and facilities for transporting, storing, distributing, mixing, dosing, homogenizing, bunkering and apportioning of bulk material; technical consulting relating to product research and development in the field of engineeringACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 11, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 6, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 18, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 20, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 31, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 14, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2014CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 2, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 12, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 12, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 27, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 22, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 8, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 7, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 22, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 21, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 21, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 1, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 11, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 23, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 20, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 20, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 16, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 15, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance