Drawing for BERRY BROS. & RUDD

USPTO serial 79031493

BERRY BROS. & RUDD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3302970Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 2, 2007
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with BERRY BROS. & RUDD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David A.W. Wong

DAVID A.W. WONG BARNES & THORNBURG LLP11 South Meridian StreetINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-3535UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines, whisky, gin, [vodka,] rum, brandyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 16, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2020LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Aug 28, 2020RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2018FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 8, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 25, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 9, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 9, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 7, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 22, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 7, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 6, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 10, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 2, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 5, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 3, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 1, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Oct 1, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2008FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 18, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 15, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 17, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 27, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 2, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 11, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 10, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 2, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 8, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 8, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 7, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance