USPTO serial 79031494
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer S. Stachniak
Jennifer S. Stachniak Johnson, Marcou & Isaacs, LLC27 City Square, Suite 1Hoschton, GA 30548UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Industrial machines, namely, apron feeders, heavy-duty apron feeders, deep drawn pan conveyors, bucket apron conveyors, pivoting pan conveyors, drag chain conveyors, mobile link conveyors, flat plate conveyors with plate, short plate conveyors, belt bucket elevators, central chain bucket elevators, double bucket elevators, bucket elevators with gravity discharge, pendulum bucket elevators for transporting, storing, distributing, withdrawing, mixing, dosing, homogenizing, bunkering and apportioning of bulk materials; machines and mechanical apparatus, namely, rotary discharged machines, also rotating, gravity discharge gates, grab unloading hoppers, armored chain conveyors, cleaning conveyors, telescopic loading spouts, stockyards and blending bed systems, bridge-type scraper reclaimers, portal- and semi portal scraper reclaimers, multiple purpose portal bridge reclaimers, cantilever scraper reclaimers, combined stacker/scraper reclaimers, circular storages with stacker and cantilever reclaimers or bridge-type scraper reclaimers for emptying bunkers, silos and large storage rooms as well as for loosening bulk material stored therein; chain conveyors and conveyors for hot material; belt conveyor systems, particularly consisting of steel plate conveyors and conveyors of different construction, belt conveyors; vertical and pendulum bucket conveyors incorporating supporting constructions in the form of belt bridges and delivery towers; systems for tipping wagons in the form of front tippers, rotary tippers and side tippers | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Cars for emptying bunkers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Product development, namely, technical planning, development, projecting and designing of apparatus, machines and facilities for transporting, storing, distributing, withdrawing, wiping off, dosing, homogenizing, bunkering and apportioning of bulk material; engineering services, namely, technical analysis services and technical survey in the field of apparatus, machines and facilities for transporting, storing, distributing, mixing, dosing, homogenizing, bunkering and apportioning of bulk material; technical consulting relating to product research and development in the field of engineering | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |