Drawing for SIL-CELL

USPTO serial 79031510

SIL-CELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3272692Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 31, 2007
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with SIL-CELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JONATHAN S. JENNINGS

Jonathan S. Jennings PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD & GERALDS200 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2900CHICAGO, IL 60606-6631UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001FILLING MATERIALS IN THE NATURE OF INERT LIGHTWEIGHT SILICA GLASS POWDER FOR USE IN MANUFACTURING SYNTHETIC MATERIALS, NAMELY, FOR MANUFACTURING REINFORCING MATERIALS FOR POLYESTER RESIN, NYLON, VINYLESTER, EPOXY RESIN, PHENOLIC RESIN, POLYURETHANE, LATEX, SYNTHETIC RUBBER AND COATINGSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 31, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 22, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 22, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 19, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 23, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 6, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 31, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jul 31, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 27, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 27, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 31, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 15, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 15, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 15, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 1, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 19, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 14, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance