Drawing for KIGILI

USPTO serial 79031522

KIGILI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3318774Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 23, 2007
Examiner
HELLMAN, ELI J
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KIGILI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Frances Love

Mary Frances Love Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, p.c.607 14th Street, N.W.8th FloorWASHINGTON, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing for men and women, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, suits, underwear, hosiery, headwear, footwear, belts, and tiesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 5, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 29, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 15, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jan 25, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 12, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 25, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 28, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 1, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 17, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2011RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 30, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 13, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 31, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 29, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 7, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 15, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 25, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 20, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 12, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 12, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 28, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 28, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance