USPTO serial 79031575
KORNINI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3373273Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 22, 2008
- Examiner
- HAMPTON, CHARISMA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KORNINI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine J. Holland
CATHERINE J. HOLLAND KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN STREETFOURTEENTH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92614Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pre-baked and baked dietetic bread and other dietetic pastry goods for medical use * except muesli * | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Flours; cereal preparations, namely, processed cereals, cereal-based snack foods * except muesli *; pasta; bread; pieces of bread; pre-baked bread, namely, dough; bread rolls; pre-baked bread rolls, namely, bread roll dough; cookies; pastries; [ confectionery goods, namely, candy; chocolate; chocolate products, namely, chocolate bars, chocolate syrup; chocolate masses and chocolate for icing; cocoa powder; cocoa products, namely, cocoa, cocoa spreads; nougat; nougat products, namely, candy with nougat; ] baking powder; bread mixes * except those used for making muesli *; bread dumplings and dough dumplings; baked and pre-baked dietetic bread and other dietetic pastries not for medical use * except muesli *; prefabricated dough portions, also deep-frozen, intended for preparing bread; spices; mixtures of spices | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by backaldrin Österreich The Kornspitz Company GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Backaldrin Österreich GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Backaldrin Österreich GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named KORNINI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 15, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 9, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 6, 2009 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 6, 2009 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 23, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 23, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |