Drawing for Serial No. 79031606

USPTO serial 79031606

Serial No. 79031606

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KAUFMAN, LAURIE R
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79031606?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
015Musical instruments especially electric or non-electric guitars and bass guitars, electronic musical instruments; music synthesizers; keyboards for musical instruments; plectrums, strings for musical instruments; holders for musical instruments, cases for musical instruments; covers for musical instrumentsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Dec 8, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 5, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 3, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 5, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 5, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 29, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 15, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 15, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 5, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 5, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 23, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 7, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 7, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 6, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2007RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW
Dec 30, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 29, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 14, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance