USPTO serial 79031639
MULTITRODE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3366102Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 8, 2008
- Examiner
- KAUFMAN, LAURIE R
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with MULTITRODE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neal E. Friedman
Neal E. Friedman Finch & Maloney PLLC50 Commercial Street, Suite 300Manchester, NH 03101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic hardware, namely: micro-controller based hardware modules for controlling pumping stations, water level sensing equipment, namely: electrical water level probes for wells having multiple discrete electrodes; electrical water level probes for wells having pressure sensors; pump monitoring equipment, namely: micro-controller based hardware for remotely monitoring water pumping installations; pump management and control equipment: namely micro-controller based hardware for remotely managing and controlling water pumping installations; data logging equipment, namely: micro-controller based hardware for recording and displaying data from water pumping installations; electronic equipment for monitoring water reservoirs: namely electronic remote level indicators having alarm LEDs and relay contacts; electronic signal isolation devices, namely relays; current shunt devices namely electrically triggered current shunts for overload protection of pumping installations; transformers; two-way radios; antennas; charging devices namely electric trickle chargers for radio equipment batteries; computer software for displaying operational status of pumping stations and facilitating monitoring and control of pumping stations; protocol translation devices, namely micro-controller based devices for converting incoming data streams of a proprietary format to an industry standard supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) format; radio modems; pressure transducers; electronic apparatus for displaying liquid levels, namely micro-controller based modules including terminals for connection to pumping installations and a screen to display liquid levels in a well of the pumping installation; telemetry equipment namely modems and radio modems for transmitting data from pump monitoring and control equipment; supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) equipment, namely micro-controller based master control units (MCUs), corresponding micro-controller based remote terminal units (RTUs) and electronic communication equipment configured to support data communication between the MCU and RTUs; electric control apparatus for use with motors, namely micro-controller based variable frequency drive controllers for controlling operating speed of variable frequency drive motors; current transformers to facilitate monitoring of motors and current shunts to prevent overvoltage damage to motors; alarm notification equipment, namely relays having alarm LEDs and normally open and normally closed contacts for monitoring pumping station well levels; equipment for the remote monitoring and control of water and wastewater facilities and infrastructure, namely micro-controller based electronic supervisory modules; computer software for monitoring and controlling water pumping installations for use in water and wastewater facilities and infrastructure; computer software for the control and monitoring of pumps and pumping stations; computer software for remote telemetry control and telemetry data acquisition; computer software for the remote monitoring and control and management of water and wastewater facilities; computer software for the operation of telemetry equipment, supervisory equipment, data logging equipment, control equipment and diagnostic equipment, all relating to water and wastewater facilities and infrastructure. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2021 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Apr 30, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |