USPTO serial 79031646
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANTHONY V. LUPO
ANTHONY V. LUPO ARENT FOX LLP1050 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper, cardboard and goods made from out of this material, namely, boxes of paper or cardboard, cardboard packaging, packing paper; printed matter, namely, brochures, advertising materials, posters, catalogs, billboards; photographs; books, prospectuses, newsletters, circular letters, and printed periodicals; indexes; newspapers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Advertising; business management; business administration; office work; advertising agency; business management consultancy; dissemination of advertising matter; publication of publicity texts; reproduction of documents; demonstration of goods; advertising and marketing, namely, development of advertising and marketing concepts, and marketing and advertising for communication media; business marketing services; business marketing services provided via digital networks; public opinion polling; conducting marketing studies; arranging and conducting marketing promotional events for others; business organization consultancy; business organizational project management in the area of information technology; business organizational planning and monitoring of the development of a company; advertising, namely, presentation of companies in virtual fairs on the Internet and other media; product demonstration, namely, presentation of goods on media communication stations, systems, and networks; sales promotion for others; advertising services provided on the Internet; business appraisals; compilation of information into computer databases; public relations; publishing of advertising texts, all the foregoing services in connection with integrated communication, i.e., with the participation of at least two media types, and also on or via the Internet | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, personal communication services, ISDN services, telecommunication access services, data transmission and reception services via telecommunication means, telecommunications gateway services; providing multiple user access to a global computer information network, telecommunications consultancy | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Providing online electronic publications in connection with advertising campaigns; publication of texts, namely, books, newsletters, magazines, and other printed matter; publishing of electronic publications, namely, books, newsletters, magazines, and other printed matter accessible via a global computer network; drafting of texts in connection with advertising campaigns; publication of books | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific research, technology consultation in the field of product and package design; industrial analysis and research services in the field of product and package design; consulting services in the field of configuration and design of homepages and websites; technological consultation in the field of telecommunication and communication technology; design of homepages and websites; creation of websites; implementation of software and meshes; conceptual design of websites; computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; computer aided design for others in the field of advertising | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2017 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 2, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 9, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 9, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 9, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 17, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 29, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 15, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |