USPTO serial 79031661
DR.MATTRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DR.MATTRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
EVOTEKS EV VE OTEL TEKSTILI; SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by EVOTEKS EV VE OTEL TEKSTILI; SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
EVOTEKS EV VE OTEL TEKSTILI; SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by EVOTEKS EV VE OTEL TEKSTILI; SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony D. Logan
Anthony D. Logan Venable, Campillo, Logan & Meaney PC1938 E. Osborn RoadPhoenix, AZ 85016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Furniture made for medical purposes, namely, air mattresses for medical purposes, stretchers, orthopedic articles, namely, beds, commode chairs, namely, toilets adapted for medical patients or for use by handicapped persons, heating cushions for medical purposes, electric blankets for medical purposes, electrically heated air pillows for medical purposes, electrically heated draw sheets for medical purposes and air pillows for medical purposes; surgical drapes, incontinence sheets, water beds for medical purposes; and hospital beds for use by burn patients | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | Furniture, namely, display stands, filing cabinets, medicine cabinets, desks, serving trolleys, deck chairs, furniture chests, camping furniture, office furniture, dining and bedroom furniture, living room furniture, bookcases, library shelves, trestle tables, tables, armchairs, settees, divans, sofas, sofa-beds, school furniture, index cabinets, kitchen and bath cabinets, mattresses, spring mattresses, pillows, cushions, air cushions, pillows and mattresses not for medical purposes, waterbeds, camping mats, namely, sleeping mats for placing under sleeping bags, locks not of metal, fittings and pieces not of metal for furniture; structural fittings for shelves and storage racks of metal; furniture casters not of metal | ABANDONED | — |
| 024 | Woven and non-woven textile fabrics for home and commercial interiors, namely, fiberglass fabrics for textile use, water proof fabrics for manufacturing clothing, furniture and automobile upholstery, and luggage; fabric of imitation animal skins; curtains and shower curtains; household cloths, namely, dish cloths, table cloths not of paper; table cloths made of plastic, bed covers made of paper, bed linen; pique, namely, a light bed sheet used in the summertime in place of a duvet; pillow cases, duvet covers, unfitted fabric covers for furniture, table runners made of fabric, napkins of textile, praying rugs, namely, traveling rugs, duvets, quilts, bed blankets, hand and face towels, bath towels; textile wall hangings, fabric handkerchiefs, flags made of fabric, labels of cloth, banners of cloth, protection covers of fabric, namely, unfitted furniture coverings of textile | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EVOTEKS EV VE OTEL TEKSTILI; SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by EVOTEKS EV VE OTEL TEKSTILI; SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named DR.MATTRESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 15, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 12, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 31, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |