Drawing for FLOWIZ

USPTO serial 79031687

FLOWIZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAUFMAN, LAURIE R
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLOWIZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith A. Weltsch

Keith A. Weltsch Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C.400 Garden City PlazaSte 300GARDEN CITY NY, NY 11530

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electromagnetic flowmetersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 16, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 5, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 11, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 9, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 15, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 9, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 9, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 12, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 11, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 11, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 2, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 31, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 31, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance