USPTO serial 79031689
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeannine A. Haas, Dermot J. Horgan, Gary H. Saposnik, Dmitriy Makarov, Vangelis Economou and Sean Swidler
Jeannine A. Haas IP Horgan, Ltd.1130 Lake Cook Road, Suite 240Buffalo Grove, IL 60089UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising, including advertising on the Internet, marketing, direct mail advertising; business management and organization consultancy, especially analyzing and optimizing of business traveling, development of savings for traveling; services of advertising agencies, namely, planning, organizing and conducting of business information events and of advertising events for promotional purposes; staff management consultancy; business administration and organizational consultancy and administrative coordination of travel agencies, services of incentive advertising agencies | ABANDONED | — |
| 039 | Rental of transport and passenger vehicles; planning, organization and conducting of travels, namely, travel booking agencies; services of brokers and tourist agencies, namely, travel and tour information services consisting of information for the organization, reservation, booking and brokerage of journeys; transport of goods; transport of passengers; arranging and booking of sightseeing, trips, day excursions and travels; travel accompaniment, namely, travel guide services; online information, reservation and booking in the nature of online travel agency services in the field of tourism and business travel, transportation and travel and ticket reservation services | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Arranging and conduction of entertainment exhibitions in the nature of organizing community sporting and cultural events and educational congresses in a wide variety of fields; recreation information, namely, providing information in the field of recreational activities; conducting of gala evening parties; special event planning; publishing of printed matter, namely, catalogues; publishing of electronic publications; publishing of books, newspapers, magazines | ABANDONED | — |
| 043 | Services for providing food and drink for patients and guests, temporary accommodation, provision of temporary accommodation and of food and drink to guests in hotels, guest houses and roadhouses; rental of summer residences, summer flats and apartments, namely, rental of rooms; rental of guest rooms; accommodation bureaus, namely, arranging temporary housing accommodations; hotel room reservation and hotel reservations for others; reservation of temporary accommodation in guest houses | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2008 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 15, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |