Drawing for MAERZ

USPTO serial 79031696

MAERZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3445378Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 10, 2008
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with MAERZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Industrial furnaces and parts thereof for the metal industry, namely, melting furnaces, hearth-type melting furnaces, batch furnaces, continuous furnaces, tilting furnaces, rotary furnaces, shaft furnaces and hearth shaft furnaces; water quenching apparatus for heat treatment; all excluding industrial furnaces and parts thereof for the calcination of limestone and dolomiteACTIVE—
037Installation, repair and maintenance of industrial furnaces and parts thereof for the metal industry, namely melting furnaces, hearth-type melting furnaces, batch furnaces, continuous furnaces, tilting furnaces, rotary furnaces, shaft furnaces, hearth shaft furnaces, and water quenching apparatus for heat treatmentACTIVE—
039Delivery of industrial furnaces and parts thereof for the metal industry, namely, melting furnaces, hearth-type melting furnaces, batch furnaces, continuous furnaces, tilting furnaces, rotary furnaces, shaft furnaces, hearth shaft furnaces and water quenching apparatus for heat treatmentACTIVE—
042Engineering and technical consulting services in the field of industrial furnace construction, construction drafting for industrial furnaces and inspection of industrial furnaces for the metal industry, namely, melting furnaces, hearth-type melting furnaces, batch furnaces, continuous furnaces, tilting furnaces, rotary furnaces, shaft furnaces, hearth shaft furnaces and water quenching apparatus for heat treatment; technical analysis of and project feasibility studies for industrial furnaces used in the metal industry, namely, melting furnaces, hearth-type melting furnaces, batch furnaces, continuous furnaces, tilting furnaces, rotary furnaces, shaft furnaces, hearth shaft furnaces and water quenching apparatus for heat treatmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 7, 2024CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 31, 2023CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Oct 8, 2023CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 5, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 12, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 9, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 11, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 2, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 13, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 10, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 25, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 18, 2008ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 10, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 10, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 29, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 15, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 25, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 29, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 11, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 10, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 27, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 14, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 1, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 12, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 11, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 30, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 29, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance