Drawing for CHATEAU LAROSE-TRINTAUDON

USPTO serial 79031704

CHATEAU LAROSE-TRINTAUDON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3398689Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 18, 2008
Examiner
BROWN, TINA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with CHATEAU LAROSE-TRINTAUDON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey M. Goehring

Jeffrey M. Goehring Nixon & Vanderhye P.C.901 N. Glebe Road, 11th FloorArlington, VA 22203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines of guaranteed label of origin, specifically, AOC wines from the wine-making estate called Château Larose TrintaudonACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 20, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 9, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2022ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Mar 9, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 9, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 12, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 31, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 8, 2015CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY NOT ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2015EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Apr 18, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 17, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 12, 201471AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Mar 12, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2010FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 23, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 18, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 18, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 26, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 18, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 29, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 2, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 13, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 8, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 7, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 6, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 6, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance