USPTO serial 79031720
CEREZYME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3856812Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 5, 2010
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CEREZYME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vincent O. Wagner
Vincent O. Wagner Woodard, Emhardt, Moriarty, McNett & Henry LLP111 Monument CircleSuite 3700Indianapolis, IN 46204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Enzymes for use in the brewing industry | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 4, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2011 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 26, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |