CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for XENIC

USPTO serial 79031733

XENIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3405669Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 1, 2008
Examiner
FICKES, JERI J
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XENIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donna J. Bunton

DONNA J. BUNTON NIXON & VANDERHYE P.C.901 N GLEBE RD FL 11ARLINGTON, VA 22203-1853UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008ELECTRIC HAIR CLIPPERS AND ELECTRIC SHEARERS FOR PERSONAL USE, ELECTRIC EPILATORY APPLIANCES, ELECTRIC RAZORS, ELECTRIC DEPILATION APPLIANCES, ELECTRIC BEARD CLIPPERS, ELECTRIC NASAL HAIR TRIMMERS, ELECTRIC MANICURE AND PEDICURE SETS, ELECTRIC APPLIANCES FOR COSMETIC USE, NAMELY, SHAVERS, NAIL BUFFERS, HAIR TRIMMERS AND HAIR CLIPPERS; NON-ELECTRIC HAIR CURLING TONGS; NON-ELECTRIC HAIR STRAIGHTENERSSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—
009ELECTRIC HAIR CURLERS, ELECTRIC HAIR CURLING TONGS; ELECTRIC HAIR STRAIGHTENERSSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—
011HAIR DRYERSSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 4, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 6, 2013INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 17, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2013INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 8, 2012INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 8, 2011C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Jul 22, 2011C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jul 22, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 17, 2011ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 3, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 1, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 15, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 26, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 13, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 6, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 15, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 5, 2007PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Sep 28, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 2, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 18, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 4, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 4, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 22, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance