Drawing for DIMAT ZIV

USPTO serial 79031737

DIMAT ZIV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3389146Status 707Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 26, 2008
Examiner
BRODY, DANIEL S
Law office
—

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with DIMAT ZIV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leigh Ann Lindquist

Leigh Ann Lindquist Sughrue Mion, PLLC2100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electric and electronic apparatus and instruments for telecommunications, namely, communication servers for electric networks, digital voice and data commutators for private networks, analogue and digital remote protection and voice and data digital multiplexersACTIVE—
037Construction, installation, repair and maintenance of electric and electronic apparatus and instruments for telecommunications, namely, communication apparatus for electric networks, digital voice and data commutators for private networks, analogue and digital remote protection apparatus and voice and data digital multiplexersACTIVE—
042[ Engineering services in the field of electronics; development of new technology for others in the field of electronics; research, design and development of electronic devices for telecommunications, namely, communication apparatus for electric networks, digital voice and data commutators for private networks, analog and digital remote protection apparatus and voice and data digital multiplexers, and excluding engineering services in the field of design, development, integration, implementation of printing systems and printing technologies ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 24, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2019IRIVIRREGULARITY ON INVALIDATION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 7, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 7, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Dec 23, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 23, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 201871AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Apr 18, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2018CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 26, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 13, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 13, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 16, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Dec 16, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 8, 2010FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 2, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 2, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 27, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 11, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 4, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 1, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 26, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 24, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 24, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 23, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 12, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 12, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 9, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance