Drawing for MORGANTE

USPTO serial 79031770

MORGANTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3468021Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 15, 2008
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with MORGANTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lori S. Meddings

Lori S. Meddings Quarles & Brady LLP33 East Main StreetSuite 900Madison, WI 53703-3095

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES EXCEPT BEER, NAMELY, WINES AND LIQUEURSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 8, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 28, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 23, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 25, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 17, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Jul 17, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 17, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 15, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 23, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 31, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 31, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 15, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 15, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 29, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 15, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 29, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 27, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 26, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 14, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 18, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 21, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 20, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 19, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance