Drawing for ZENTIS BELFRUTTA

USPTO serial 79031814

ZENTIS BELFRUTTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3445383Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 10, 2008
Examiner
LEE, JANET H
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZENTIS BELFRUTTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jere M. Webb

Jere M. Webb Stoel Rives LLP900 SW Fifth AvenueSuite 2600Portland, OR 97204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietetic food adapted for medical purposes, namely, dietetic foods containing fruits, fruit components, fruit bases, fruit juices and/or fruit flavors, in particular dietetic and low-calorie jams, marmalades, fruit jellies, fruit spreads, fruit creams, fruit mousseSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
029Jams, marmalades, jellies, namely, sweet bread spreads, non-confectionery fruit jellies, fruit-based spreads, compotes; fruit fillings for bakery products, namely, fruit-based fillings for cakes and pies; cooked, dried, preserved and deep-frozen fruitsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 19, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 16, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 25, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 16, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 16, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 16, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 10, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 29, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 15, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 25, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 19, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 16, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 15, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 8, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 8, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 4, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 12, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 14, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 13, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance