USPTO serial 79031816
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Heinz Weyermann; Röstmalzbierbrauerei Bamberg GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by Heinz Weyermann; Röstmalzbierbrauerei Bamberg GmbH
Heinz Weyermann; Röstmalzbierbrauerei Bamberg GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by Heinz Weyermann; Röstmalzbierbrauerei Bamberg GmbH
Heinz Weyermann; Röstmalzbierbrauerei Bamberg GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by Heinz Weyermann; Röstmalzbierbrauerei Bamberg GmbH
DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil F. Greenblum
Neil F. Greenblum Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.1950 ROLAND CLARKE PLACERESTON, VA 20191-1411UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Roasted malt beer, malt beer, malt wort, beer wort, beer and extracts for producing beer, namely, roasted malt beer extract, malt beer extract, malt wort extract, beer wort extract, beer extract, hop extract | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |