USPTO serial 79031832
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James J. Bitetto
James J. Bitetto Keusey, Tutunjian & Bitetto, P.C.20 Crossways Park North, Suite 210Woodbury, NY 11797UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Wallets; key rings made of leather; leather and imitation of leather and goods made of these materials not included in other classes, namely, garment bags for travel, beach bags, briefcases, business card cases, handbags; imitation leather, namely, sponge leather, imitation leather paper, artificial fur, polyurethane leather; key cases made of leather; net bags for shopping; purses, not of precious metal; school bags; school satchels; shopping bags; suitcase handles; suitcases; vanity cases sold empty; gym bags; valises; animal skins; trunks and traveling bags;umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks; whips, harness and saddlery | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Belts; gloves; clothing, namely, underwear panties, brassieres, corsets, suspender belts, hosiery, stockings, socks, petticoats, nightgowns, pajamas, dressing gowns, bathrobes, pullovers, cardigans, sweaters, sweat-shirts, T-shirts, track suits, skirts, jackets, trousers, shirts, vests, jumpers, blouses, jeans, pants, B'ermuda shorts, suits and dresses, overcoats, cloaks, anoraks, raincoats, bathing suits, bikinis, ties, foulards, scarves; footwear; headgear, namely, hats and caps | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 18, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 29, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 15, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 11, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |