USPTO serial 79031841
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd
North Ryde, New South Wales, AU
Other trademarks owned by Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd
AU
Other trademarks owned by Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd
AU
Other trademarks owned by Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda Marie Norcross
Linda Marie Norcross Aristocrat Technologies, Inc.10220 Aristocrat WayLas Vegas, NV 89135UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and computer software being computer hardware and computer software for gaming purposes; gaming machines adapted for use with an external display screen and parts and accessories for gaming machines in this class, namely software modules, storage media and components and erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM) chips; blank magnetic data carriers, blank recording discs; apparatus for recording, transmission, reproduction or display of sound or images; storage media namely blank compact discs, digital versatile discs; data processors; electronic systems for linking gaming and poker machines, namely controllers, displays, machine interface cards, computer boards, metres, computer software and firmware and electrical wires and cable; computer peripherals | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Gaming machines other than those adapted for use with an external display screen including poker machines featuring games of chance or games of mixed chance and skill or pseudo skill; gaming machines other than those adapted for use with an external display screen including poker machines comprised of software modules and components including game symbols, mathematics, sound effects and other configurable items embedded in erasable programmable read-only memory | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2010 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 13, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2007 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |