Drawing for SANITIZED MORE THAN CLEAN

USPTO serial 79031846

SANITIZED MORE THAN CLEAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3366109Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 8, 2008
Examiner
GLASSER, CARYN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SANITIZED MORE THAN CLEAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patricia L. Werner

Patricia L. Werner BRYAN CAVE LLP1290 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNew York, NY 10104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical products, namely, liquids and powders, for finishing and treating paint and materials made of natural and artificial fibres, leather, synthetic materials, rubber and paper; all the afore-mentioned goods being for the protection against the growth and development of micro-organisms, bacteria and fungiSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
040Chemical treatment of paint and of materials made of natural and artificial fibres, leather, synthetic materials, rubber and paper; all the afore-mentioned services being for the protection against the growth and development of micro-organisms, bacteria and fungiSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 26, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 8, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 23, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 26, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Dec 26, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 8, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 22, 2008DCPNCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 22, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 22, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 10, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 23, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 3, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 20, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 18, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 18, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 14, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2007GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 11, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 11, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 10, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 9, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
May 9, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 8, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 18, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 29, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 10, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance