USPTO serial 79031875
Q
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3449636Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 17, 2008
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with Q?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd
North Ryde, New South Wales, AU
Other trademarks owned by Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd
AU
Other trademarks owned by Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd
AU
Other trademarks owned by Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeanine M. Mitchell
Jeanine M. Mitchell ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.10220 Aristocrat WayLas Vegas, NV 89135UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and computer software being computer hardware and computer software for gaming purposes; gaming machines adapted for use with an external display screen and parts and accessories for gaming machines in this class, namely, software modules, storage media and components and erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM) chips; blank magnetic data carriers, blank recording discs; apparatus for recording, transmission, reproduction or display of sound or images excluding telecommunications equipment; storage media, namely, blank compact discs, digital video discs; data processors; electronic systems for linking gaming and poker machines, namely, controllers, displays, machine interface cards, computer boards, metres, computer software and firmware and electrical wires and cable; computer peripherals | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Gaming machines other than those adapted for use with an external display screen including poker machines featuring games of chance or games of mixed chance and skill or pseudo skill; gaming machines other than those adapted for use with an external display screen including poker machines comprised of software modules and components including game symbols, mathematics, sound effects and other configurable items embedded in erasable programmable read-only memory | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named Q
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2014 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| May 17, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 6, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2010 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 29, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 15, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |