Drawing for DENSCOMP

USPTO serial 79031894

DENSCOMP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3366115Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 8, 2008
Examiner
FLOWERS, JAY K
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DENSCOMP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus

Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Non-precious metals and metal alloys all for use in further manufacture in the mechanical engineering industry; Sintered metal alloy bars, tubes, rods, strips, wires, molded parts, pressed parts, rolled parts, cast parts, casting molds, and molded parts all for use in further manufacture in the mechanical engineering industry; castings, powder, and rolled, drawn, pressed or extruded semi-finished metal alloys for use in further manufacture in the mechanical engineeringSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 28, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 7, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 21, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 21, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 15, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 15, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 8, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 19, 2008CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Dec 5, 2008CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 22, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 22, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 10, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 23, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 3, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 17, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 8, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 3, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 9, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 21, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 21, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 17, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 16, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance