Drawing for BECCOS ULTRA SYSTEM

USPTO serial 79031897

BECCOS ULTRA SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JORDAN, AMEETA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BECCOS ULTRA SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Electric massage apparatus; ultrasound apparatus; electric therapy apparatus; induction magnetic apparatusSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 19, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 10, 2014LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Mar 6, 2014RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2014CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 19, 2013LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Aug 16, 2013RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 19, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 15, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 15, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 15, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 15, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 23, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 6, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 3, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance