Drawing for EROWA

USPTO serial 79031907

EROWA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3369623Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 15, 2008
Examiner
HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with EROWA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael D. Beck

Michael D. Beck Maginot, Moore & Beck, LLPOne Indiana SquareSuite 2200Indianapolis, IN 46204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machine tools for metal working, namely, tools for milling, EDM (electrical discharge machine), wire-EDM and grinding machines; metal machining machines, namely, milling, lathe, EDM, wire-EDM and grinding machines; automatic tool changing devices and tool loading devices for metal working machine tools, EDM electrodes, pallets and work pieces; robots for automatically changing and replacing machine tools and work pieces on a metal working machine; robots for automatically conveying machine tools and work pieces to a metal working machine; clamping and palletization devices, namely, material handling machines, namely, metal clamps used for holding piece parts on metal working tools and palletizers; tools for drop forging and die stamping, namely, press dies for metal formingACTIVE—
009Measuring machines for measuring the position of machine tools and work pieces relative to metal working machines and pallets; calipers included in tool and work piece measuring stations; electric and electronic measuring instruments and apparatus for measuring metal working machine tools and work pieces, electronic identification devices for identifying machine tools and work pieces, namely, magnetically and optically encoded labeling therefor, namely, magneto-optical pens; optical apparatus, namely optical character recognition apparatus, for reading optically encoded labeling on machine tools and work pieces; computer programs for controlling machines to load and unload tools and work pieces from a metal working machine for job management of metal working machines, and tool and work piece measuring stationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 3, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 29, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 23, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 13, 201371AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Sep 13, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2011RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 7, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 25, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 25, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 16, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 30, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 10, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 22, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 17, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 17, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 1, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 30, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 11, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 7, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 7, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 7, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 6, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance