Drawing for GLAMOURFLAGE

USPTO serial 79031936

GLAMOURFLAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HABEEB, MYRIAH A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GLAMOURFLAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Skincare creams and products, namely bath oil, bath lotion, bath milk, bath salts, body cream, body mask cream, body powder, body scrub, bubble bath, face creams, face and body glitter, face powder, hand creams, lip balm, make-up powder, shower and bath gel, skin moisturizer, skin moisturizer masks, soaps, talcum powder; and cosmeticsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 19, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 15, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 25, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 20, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 16, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 15, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 15, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 10, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 9, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 20, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 6, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 5, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 23, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance