Drawing for DOGSLEEPER

USPTO serial 79031991

DOGSLEEPER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HABEEB, MYRIAH A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOGSLEEPER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Pet beds; travel pet beds; portable dog beds; a portable dog bed consisting of a rollable bed unit and two bowl shaped end pieces of waterproof textile materials for use as travel food bowl and travel water bowlSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
021Food bowls and water bowls for petsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 10, 2017UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Dec 31, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 30, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 20, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 7, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 5, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 5, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 22, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 22, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 7, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 12, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 11, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 1, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 11, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 30, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 29, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 22, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance