USPTO serial 79032026
MISTER WONG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MISTER WONG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Services of an advertising agency, on-line advertising on a computer network, arranging of trade and economic contacts, also on the Internet, advertising on the Internet (for others); data storage, database research on the Internet (for others) | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing of chatrooms on the Internet, providing of providing chatlines, chatrooms and forums, e-mail services, message forwarding and message sending on the Internet (web messaging) | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Updating of Internet websites, providing search engines for the use on the Internet, data management on servers, rental of database software, creating and programming websites, web sites design editing; providing webspace on the Internet (hosting); platforms on the Internet, providing of portals on the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 28, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 22, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 10, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |