Drawing for VSK KENTAVAR

USPTO serial 79032077

VSK KENTAVAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3414738Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 22, 2008
Examiner
OKEKE, BENJAMIN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with VSK KENTAVAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 Third Avenue, 10th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ Machines, namely, threading machines, combined wood working machines, wood cutting machines, woodworking machines for deep holes and grilles, table chamfer machines. woodcutting machines with inclining shaft, circular woodworking machines with inclining units; ] machine tools for the cutting and forming of materials; electric motors for machines; power transmissions and gearing for machines [ ; agricultural implements other than hand-operated, namely, harvesters and combines; incubators for eggs ]ACTIVE—
025[ Clothing, namely, overalls, pants, shirts, jackets, coats, uniforms; footwear ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 30, 2018NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2018C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 23, 2018ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 1, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 3, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 11, 2015INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 11, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 14, 2015INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 14, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 14, 201471.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
May 14, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 22, 201471AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Apr 22, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 11, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 22, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 22, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 5, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 5, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 28, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 5, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 27, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 27, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 27, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 3, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 29, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 7, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 7, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 5, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 4, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 22, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance