Drawing for Serial No. 79032092

USPTO serial 79032092

Serial No. 79032092

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3392081Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 4, 2008
Examiner
HABEEB, MYRIAH A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79032092?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Automobiles; cars; electric vehicles, namely, electric land vehicles; mini automobiles; tractors; refrigerator cars; automotive chassis; engines for land vehicles; automotive bodies; automotive absorbers, namely, shock absorbers for automobilesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 26, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 26, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 4, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 1, 2015CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 31, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 31, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 4, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2014715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 3, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 6, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 6, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 4, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 4, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 18, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 28, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 9, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 8, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 29, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 29, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 10, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 1, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 12, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 12, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 4, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 22, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance