USPTO serial 79032136
THREE2SEVEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THREE2SEVEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Publication online of a free weekly social magazine and entertainment for women through an online community using life experiences | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 045 | Provision of social information for women via an online community using life experiences | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2017 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 28, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |