Drawing for CS CARL-OTTO SCHARTENBERG

USPTO serial 79032168

CS CARL-OTTO SCHARTENBERG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CS CARL-OTTO SCHARTENBERG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising; business management; business administration; office functionsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto; industrial analysis and research services; design and development of computer hardware and software; legal servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
045Personal and social services rendered by others to meet the needs of individuals; security services for the protection of property and individualsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 2, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 6, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 20, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 18, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 22, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 22, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 18, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 18, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 13, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 22, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 22, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 21, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 22, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance