USPTO serial 79032198
BITESOFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3340334Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 20, 2007
- Examiner
- HAMPTON, CHARISMA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with BITESOFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AU
AU
BRIGHTON VIC 3187, AU
BRIGHTON VIC 3187, AU
BRIGHTON VIC 3187, AU
AU
AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven J. Solomon
Steven J. Solomon Pearne & Gordon LLP1801 East 9th StreetSuite 1200Cleveland, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | bite splints; bite guards, namely, dental bite trays; occlusal splints | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Belinda Anne Dobbins
- Other trademarks owned by Ian Leslie Withers
- Other trademarks owned by Myolab Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Myolab Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Myolab Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Belinda Anne Dobbins
- Other trademarks owned by Ian Leslie Withers
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named BITESOFT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 12, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 29, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | AMPB | AMENDMENT/PETITION AFTER APPROVAL FOR PUB ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 17, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 6, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |