Drawing for OLIO DON LUIGI SICILIAN EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL

USPTO serial 79032218

OLIO DON LUIGI SICILIAN EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OLIO DON LUIGI SICILIAN EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN ALUMIT

John Alumit Patel & Alumit16830 Ventura Blvd., Suite 360Encino, CA 91436UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Olive oilABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 19, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 10, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 16, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 16, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 16, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 16, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 16, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 16, 2009OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Oct 31, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 3, 2008OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2008OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Oct 2, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 1, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 11, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 5, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 28, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 27, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 22, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 22, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 15, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 15, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 18, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 21, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 20, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 1, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 23, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 7, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 7, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 6, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 22, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance