Drawing for SEAS THE ART OF SOUND PERFECTION

USPTO serial 79032256

SEAS THE ART OF SOUND PERFECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3307602Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 9, 2007
Examiner
JORDAN, AMEETA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with SEAS THE ART OF SOUND PERFECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Erica R Halstead

Erica R Halstead Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP950 3rd Avenue, Suite 2400New York, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Loudspeakers - apparatus for reproduction of soundACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 8, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2023CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2023ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Apr 24, 2023EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Apr 24, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 24, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2023COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 6, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 10, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Oct 10, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 10, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 7, 201371AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Oct 7, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2008FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 24, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 16, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 24, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 15, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 15, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 6, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 4, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 22, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance