Drawing for PEFLAVIT C

USPTO serial 79032373

PEFLAVIT C

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3468033Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 15, 2008
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PEFLAVIT C?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D Wells

Nicholas D Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 N. Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparation for enhancing the resistance of the capillary wall and reduce its intensified permeabilitySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 2, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 28, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 17, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 2, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2011RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 30, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2008FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 31, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 31, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 15, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 15, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 19, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 22, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 22, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 29, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 24, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 25, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 25, 2008ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 3, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 16, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 16, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 15, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 23, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 23, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 23, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 22, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 22, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance