Drawing for CHILD SAFETY

USPTO serial 79032426

CHILD SAFETY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3462465Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 8, 2008
Examiner
MUNSON OTT, MARY DEIRDRE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHILD SAFETY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James L. Scott

James L. Scott Warner Norcross & Judd LLP111 Lyon Street NW900 Fifth Third CenterGrand Rapids, MI 49503-2487

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006metal pipes; cast iron, cast iron for use in hydraulics, sanitation, road systems and buildings; cast iron manhole covers and underground inspection chambers all of cast-iron for utilities, sanitation, and maintenance of roads and buildings and underground inspection chambers all of metal for utilities, sanitation, and maintenance of roads and buildings; gratings of cast-iron and gratings of metal; cast-iron gullies; underground telecommunications chamber covers of cast iron for utilities, service and maintenance thereof; cast iron for use in the manufacture of ornaments and decoration; fittings of cast iron or metal for street furniture, namely, bench legs of cast-iron and bench legs of metal sold separately from benches, metal bollards, cast iron bollards, trash cans and chimney backs of cast iron; modular covering of cast iron for gutters and hoppersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 17, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 11, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 24, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 24, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 13, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 5, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 20, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 4, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 8, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 8, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 13, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 29, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 17, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 26, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 26, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 5, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 20, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 20, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 18, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 17, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance