USPTO serial 79032439
NICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3488796Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 19, 2008
- Examiner
- HALMEN, KATHERINE E
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with NICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
22335 Hamburg, DE
22335 Hamburg, DE
22335 Hamburg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Staple
David W. Staple Casimir Jones, S.C.2275 Deming Way, Suite 310Middleton, WI 53562UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware for audio, video, entertainment, communications, data processing, environmental control, motorized furniture control, and cabin management systems in aircraft cabins; computer software for operating audio, video, entertainment, communications, data processing, environmental control, motorized furniture control, and cabin management systems in aircraft cabins | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance, and repair of aircraft and aircraft parts and fittings, namely, electric and electronic apparatus and data processing equipment and computers, all for use in aircraft cabins for entertainment and cabin management purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer hardware and software exclusively for use in aircraft, in aircraft maintenance, and in equipping the cabins of aircraft for entertainment and cabin management purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lufthansa Technik AG
- Other trademarks owned by Lufthansa Technik AG
- Other trademarks owned by Lufthansa Technik AG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NICE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 8, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |